Sunday, September 1, 2019

80 Years Ago

Remembering September 1, 1939, when the brave soldiers of the Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS fought for the Fatherland and the Aryan/Nordic race. Your sacrifice is not forgotten. Meine ehre heisst treue.

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

We believe that the Aryan population of this continent should be free, along with all the peoples of good will, to pursue its separate destiny according to the principles of self-determination and racial solidarity in a sovereign state representing its vital needs and interests.  - ANP "What We Stand For"

Why is this important? Consider this recent article from the Pew Research Center:

109 US Counties have become majority nonwhite since 2000

 Some highlights from the article:

  • In the United States, the white share of the population is declining as Hispanic, Asian and black populations grow.
  • Overall, 293 U.S. counties were majority nonwhite in 2018.
  • In 21 of the 25 biggest U.S. counties by population, nonwhite groups together make up more than half of residents. 
  • As the nation’s racial and ethnic diversity grows, whites remain the single largest racial or ethnic group in the U.S. when looking at the country as a whole, accounting for 60% of all Americans.
  •  From 2000 to 2018, just two counties went from minority white to majority white: Calhoun County in South Carolina and West Feliciana Parish in Louisiana, each with relatively small populations of about 15,000.
  • The number of multiracial Americans is rising, for example, and in a recent Pew Research Center survey, about half of U.S. Hispanic adults identified their race as white.

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

And, so it begins. Can't someone explain to me what happened to the British? I can just imagine ol' cigar chewing Winston now,
"We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender... unless it is to an advertisement that promotes harmful stereotypes: men being men, women being women, and other such nonsense. Then will raise our arms in complete capitulation."

How long before this nonsense crosses the ocean? Fair warning. 

keywords: Culture, Media, SJW, Britain, British, gender

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

I know the libtards hate this (facts), but occasionally they are important. With all the anti-White rhetoric in the "news", this was interesting:

Some highlights from the article include:

  • "... the big picture about mass killings: that they represent a small fraction of annual gun deaths, that they are not surging, and that about half are committed by whites, not a share out of line with the general U.S. populace."
  • "...two-thirds of shooters are found to have serious mental problems but that the media coverage has focused on those with an ideological bent such as racism or nativism."
  • "...the uproar over white nationalism has shifted the focus from what some researchers describe as the biggest drivers of mass shootings, including family breakdown, childhood trauma, mental illness,..."
  • "...Black offenders committed 50.5% of felony mass killings..."
from Motherhood & Family, What We Stand For

Amerika Erwache!

Friday, August 2, 2019

I thought the next post would be about the Democommie circle-jerk on CNN (Communist News Network), but it was the same old same old. Nothing to see here. Move along. I was at a loss. Then bam, bam, bam! Hat-trick. Three items in a row. All with the common theme of erasing traditional white culture from this continent:

Story 1: SJWs in Delaware successfully remove the only monument/memorial to Confederate troops in their state.

Story 2: A push to indoctrinate children with LGBTQ(WXYZ) children's programming.

Story 3: More illegals bum-rush the border.

Any one of these would make for an interesting article to pick apart and look at the underlying issues and agendas. And of course, the first story is near-and-dear to my heart. But it was the third story, the illegals, that really floored me. The sheer numbers beggar the imagination. 1.1 Million in one year by the end of next month. The Allies invaded Normandy with only 156,000 soldiers. From the article:
As of June 30, U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel had made contact with 905,926 migrants, including 694,229 who entered the country without permission. The 694,229 figure nine months into fiscal 2019 was more than double the 310,000 who illegally crossed the southern border in all of fiscal 2017.
...CBP facilities on the southwest border can comfortably hold 4,000 people, with 6,000 in custody putting the agency in crisis mode. In early June, the agency had 19,000 in custody. 
I was going to cross-reference this article with a look at the Immigration and Nationality of Act of 1965, which essentially opened the floodgates to non-Whites. Prior to that, the Immigration Act of 1924 was more or less the law of the land, and "was "to preserve the ideal of American [Northwestern European] homogeneity"." But LBJ, who was Jewish by race if not by religion, and his cronies thought it would be a good idea to change the demographics of the country. But, that is story for another time.

But I should like to point out that among other relevant tenets of National Socialism, the ANP specifically states: "We demand the withdrawal of all US military presence from around the globe, and place our troops instead at our borders to defend from foreign invasion. " - found in the Foreign Policy & Defense section

If you don't think we are under invasion, you need to pay more attention and look up the meaning of the word. From the Oxford Dictionary: Invasion: ..."An incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity."

Amerika Erwache!
"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children"

UPDATE: As a result of the recent shooting in El Paso, Texas, I feel it necessary, sadly, once again to reiterate as I have done throughout this blog that I do NOT advocate the use of violence to address the issues and concerns highlighted here. The sole purpose of everything written on this blog is to raise awareness. It is not a call to direct action. Such violent action does absolutely no good, and indeed, is harmful to the aims of White nationalists everywhere. We can change the direction our country is going. We can preserve the White race in North America and elsewhere. But it must be done legally and non-violently. Just as the Liberals/Communists in this country have done, we need to change it from the inside, from the ground up, through elected office, over time. Otherwise we just add fuel to the fire against us. I do not speak for the ANP, but I do know they, too, are a non-violent group espousing increasing awareness among other Whites of the challenges facing our race. Change can happen, but only if we can gather enough like minded people to our cause. We, the United States, have an Army. What we need to do is bring them home and station them on OUR border if we want illegal immigration to stop. Shooting a bunch of shoppers in a Walmart is not the answer. Please, please. No more senseless attacks. It only causes us all irrevocable harm. 

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

And finally, Part III of "The Biggest Company You've Never Heard Of": BlackRock

In Part I we looked at a number of corporations and market sectors over-which they exert an influence. In Part II we looked out how, in turn, their position as a dominate shareholder in powerful corporate entities enables them to funnel money by way of campaign contributions and PACs to politicians of note.

Who is in charge of this? Who wields this sort of power and influence? Again, everything that follows is a matter of public record. In fact, depending on your perspective, it is not even negative. If you own shares in BlackRock, or BlackRock manages your assets, why wouldn't you want them to have power and influence? The more, the better, I assume.

But from another perspective, and this is mine, I question whether any one group of individuals should have that sort of fiscal power. If such is not being used for the greater good, then whose good is it being used for? What narrow interest or group is being served with this vast power and wealth?Based on the assumption that very few people are completely altruistic, I believe it is worth knowing who runs BlackRock and benefits from it.

BlackRock was founded in 1988 by Larry Fink (Jew), Robert S. Kapito (Jew), Susan Wagner (Jew), Barbara Novick (Jew), Ben Golub (Jew), Hugh Frater (Gentile), Ralph Schlosstein (Jew), and Keith Anderson (Gentile)

So, of the original group of 8, 6 are Jewish.
But who is calling the shots now? (

Larry Fink (Jewish)
Chairman and CEO

Robert Kapito (Jewish)

Rob L. Goldstein (Jewish)
Chief Operating Officer
Global Head of BlackRock Solutions

Ben Golub (Jewish)
Chief Risk Officer

Gary Shedlin (Jewish)
Chief Financial Officer

Derek Stein (Jewish)
Global Head of Technology & Operations

Mark K. Wiedman (Jewish)
Head of International and Corporate Stategy

Mark D. Wiseman (Jewish)
Global Head of Active Equities
Chairman, BlackRock Alternative Investors

See a trend?

Of course, the focus is on the top cheese: Larry Fink. Larry has a net worth over $1 Billion dollars, and is always on the Forbes Most Influential list. Larry is also good for inspiring quotes, such as:
Laurence “Larry” Fink, the founder and chief executive of BlackRock, recently told the firm’s 14,000 employees that he is instituting potentially the most aggressive diversity program in Corporate America ensuring that, “a bunch of white men”, will no longer be running the world’s largest money management firm. (
 Another gem from his letter to CEOs:
Profits are in no way inconsistent with purpose – in fact, profits and purpose are inextricably linked. (
And he is a recipient of the John C. Whitehead Humanitarian Award, though not everyone thinks he deserves that, given the number of arms manufacturers BlackRock invests in.

Larry and the rest of the crew at BlackRock might be nice people. I don't know. I've never met them. I suspect we run in different circles. Being the top asset/money manager in the world, it's reasonable to assume they are good at what they do.  But if you look at the types of companies they are willing to invest in as shown in Part I, it is apparent that they value money, the making of money, and the control of money above all else. If they had to put your interest, or your family's interest, or your community's interest above theirs, would they?

Contrast this with point 24 of the original NSDAP program:
The Party...combats the Jewish-materialist spirit within us and without us, and is convinced that our nation can only achieve permanent health from within on the principal:
The Common Interest before Self

 What can you do about this? Honestly, probably not much. At least, right now. BlackRock has their greedy little hands in so many pies it would be tough to eat without throwing at least a few shekles in their pocket. I recommend trying not to purchase products from companies they have shares in. Not always possible, but worth trying. But real change is going to have to be systemic. A BlackRock can happen because capitalism allows it to. It's baked into the cake. For an true alternative, please visit my friends at the ANP and offer to help. It is going to take time. It is going to take continued growing awareness. It is going to take Not Giving Up. 

Amerika Erwache!

Saturday, July 13, 2019

BLACKROCK PART II (part I precedes this post)

In this installment of "the Biggest company you've never heard of"- BlackRock,
we are going to look at buying stock- in politicians. The underlying assumption of course is that money equates to power, or at the very least has an influence on those that wield power, in Washington, DC. (In related news, water is wet). It is important to keep in mind that there are contribution limits to specific candidates and their related PACS. One company can only contribute so much. But, if you own large parts of many companies it makes it very easy to contribute as much as you want, to whomever you want.

Again, this is all public information and I encourage you to indulge your curiosity. Start at OpenSecrets and look up a political figure. You can find individual contributions as well as corporate contributions and PACs. Then, go to the Holdings Channel, type in the ticker for the corporate donor (I often had to go to Wikipedia to find that), and look at who owns the shares in the company. Do this a lot, and you will begin to notice a pattern.See if you can spot the pattern from the information that follows:

Most recent campaign or 2019-2020 cycle, top 5 contributors:

Donald Trump
2020 Campaign
1.       Nucor Corp. Blackrock 3rd largest shareholder
2.       Wells Fargo. Blackrock 3rd largest shareholder
3.       Department of Defense. –Not sure what to do with this. See part I.
4.       Delta Air Lines. Blackrock 3rd largest shareholder
5.       Duty Free Americas. Private (Falic family-Jewish)

Mike Pence
Vice President
1.       Club for Growth. PAC
2.       Cummins, Inc. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
3.       Eli Lilly and Company. Blackrock 3rd largest shareholder
4.       Klipsch (Voxx). Blackrock 7th largest shareholder
5.       Associated Builders and Contractors. Trade association.

Nancy Pelosi
House Speaker
2020 Campaign
1.       Bad Robot Productions (Private, JJ Abrams, Jew)
2.       Certain Software (Private. Jewish)
3.       Gehry Partners LLP (Private. Jewish)
4.       Uni-Trade, LLC (Private company. Hispanic)
5.       Facebook Inc., Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder.

Kevin McCarthy (R. CA)- Majority Leader
Top PAC contributors for 2017-2018
1.       Goldman Sachs. Jewish run. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
2.       Federated Investors Inc.. Blackrock 1st largest shareholder
3.       Altria Group, Inc.  Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
4.       Oracle Corporation. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
5.       Citigroup Inc. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder

Chuck Grassley
President pro tem (Senate)
1.       Votesane PAC (PAC)
2.       BlueCross/BlueShield (Federation of 36 Health insurance companies. Includes Anthem. Blackrock 1st largest shareholder
3.       Verizon Communications. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
4.       NextEra Energy. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
5.       Comcast Corp. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder

Chuck Schumer
Senate Minority Leader
1.       Paul, Weiss (Private law firm)
2.       PricewaterhouseCoopers (Private firm)
3.       Deloitte Touche (UK private company)
4.       Lockheed Martin. Blackrock 3rd largest shareholder
5.       Norpac. (Pro-Isreal PAC) “NORPAC hosts fundraisers for various political candidates who are supportive of the U.S.-Israel relationship.”  -

Mitch McConnell
Senate Majority Leader
1.       Altria Group. Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
2.       United Parcel Service (UPS). Blackrock 2nd largest shareholder
3.       Eli Lilly & Co. Blackrock 3rd largest shareholder
4.       Metlife, Inc. Blackrock 1st largest shareholder
5.       BGR Group (lobbying firm)

Spot the pattern? BlackRock not only owns shares in the companies noted in Part I, and thereby have an influence on what that company does or produces, but also what politicians to "help" financially. (Another thing that caught my eye was that it appears to be Democrats who have more "Private firm" donors, and Republicans that have more publicly traded company donors. Interesting).

To dig deeper, the next step would be to ascertain what laws or regulations have been enacted, or quashed, on behalf of their corporate donors. But that is for another post (if not a book).

I think we can assume that when BlackRock calls Lockheed Martin (being their 3rd largest shareholder), Lockheed Martin takes the call. I wonder if the same applies if Lockheed Martin calls Chuck Schumer (being his 4th largest contributor) and says, "Hey, Chuck, a friend of mine from BlackRock is going to call you soon. Be great if you could take the call."

In the next post, we will look at BlackRock itself. Who, exactly, is wielding all this power and influence?

Amerika Erwache!